This forum post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Andrew Papa. Show Details
This forum post is hidden because you have submitted an abuse report against it. Show Details
Medical ethics is something which we often take for granted until something disrupts the status quo. This may be a new technology, a perceived change in society, or even a breaking scandal involving healthcare workers or researchers. Consequently, healthcare and biomedical research openly acknowledge the need for ethical standards and research to determine what those standards should be, what values underlie them and how they are interpreted, whether in the classroom or the clinic, whether at the laboratory bench or at the bedside. Where do these ideas come from, which political leaders and professions accept, reject, endorse or negotiate? What counts as evidence in biomedical ethics: well-argued philosophical views? A sound interpretation of existing laws and religious viewpoints? Empirical research demonstrating how ethical values and standards are enacted?
Comments on this and related fora are greatly appreciated, however this issue will be discussed at a meeting and dinner in London on Wdnesday June 20th 2012 at the Royal Society of Medicine, London. This meeting will leed the discussion with three perspectives from 'ground' up to government-advisor and from junior to senior academic in order to generate discussion among clinicians, researchers, academicians and public representives.
The RSM Open Section (organising) are particuarly delighted to announce that Professor Daniel Sulmasy, member of the US Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, will be delivering the keynote presentation on Evidence-based bioethics.
Meeting Aims and Objectives:
AIMS: To discuss what counts as evidence for medical and research bodies as well as governments in the area of medical ethics and biomedical research ethics
OBJECTIVES: At the end of the meeting participants will:
- Have heard about what is considered as evidence by the US President's Commission on Bioethics
- Have been shown data from a qualitative study illustrating possible relationships between medical ethics and medical practice.
- Have had the opportunity to discuss different kinds of research in ethics, law and professionalism, and to debate were different types of research may be more or less relevant
- Have had the opportunity to discuss the "Theory: practice gap" - described as the difference between what should happen and what does happen, in the context of the professional behaviours of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
BOOKING and explantory video www.rsm.ac.uk/open
5.15pm Registration, tea and coffee
5.45pm Welcome by Chair
5.50pm How do medical ethics translate from the classroom to the consulting room? Some observations from primary care - Dr Andrew Papanikitas, President-elect, RSM Open Section
6.05pm Is there a role for bioethics and the medical humanities in UK policy-making? - Dr Natalie Banner, Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellow, Centre for Humanities and Health, KCL
6.25pm Evidence-based Bioethics, a myth or reality? Prof. Daniel Sumasy, member of the US Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Kilbride-Clinton Professor of Medicine and Ethics in the Department of Medicine and Divinity School; Associate Director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics in the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
7.35 Close of meeting and optional dinner with the speakers and committe for those who have booked (we do not have funding to cover the cost of this but all are welcome to book)