What do you think?

Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?
False
General clinical
Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?
Discuss any specialty in this open forum for all healthcare professionals
At the BMJ today we had a meeting for our Journals, such as Gut and Heart and we had a talk from Tad Campion, the online editor of the NEJM about their experience of social media. The NEJM put up thei
1
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:GeneralClinical
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:GeneralClinicalDiscussion:2d33aa15-0f4c-4dcf-b15b-8e4f24adbcc2

Forums » Open clinical » General clinical » Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register
 
 First << 1 2 3 >> Last
Forums  »  Open clinical  »  General clinical  »  Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 31/3/2012 12:24 AM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 1
First: 31/3/2012
Last: 31/3/2012
I think it is important to know others opinion about health in general. It is open to everybody.

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 31/3/2012 8:28 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 1593
First: 24/12/2008
Last: 14/5/2013
No I will not be using Wiki information for treating patients. However, the site containts fair bit of information in simple ways and many of them have been linked to relevant references (though all are not referred to standard scientific information). This is good when we want to refresh our memory (that we already knew and just got confused - here we will know if there is incorrect information) or to start something very new topic that we have no idea at all. It will give good description and references from where we can start working.

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 31/3/2012 9:03 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 2947
First: 10/3/2009
Last: 29/4/2013
I agree, Mat. I think Wikepedia and numerous other sites are a great way to sharpen up and clean up a tool which is rusty in your tool box. 

I came across a condition yesterday I had not heard of; Birt-Hogg Dubé syndrome and they talked about tuberose sclerosis complex and its overlap with LAM and the perivascular epithelial cell and PEComas which are tumours. If someone comes along with something like this, I am not going to pull out my French Harrison's but Google it. 

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 1/4/2012 12:24 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 1784
First: 7/3/2009
Last: 18/5/2013
For general reading and finding something rare to start the search yes.
For treatment not likely.
Wikipedia is not to be confused with Gymnopedies by Satie, an interesting musical piece Wink.

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 1/4/2012 1:09 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 2034
First: 12/3/2010
Last: 17/5/2013

Duane, re "Invisible Web"
Thanks, I will keep Infomine as a Favourite and use it next time I'm datamining.
Resources that are sequestered behind a paywall are sometimes a frustration, but I don't think this is supposed to solve that.     Yes, Google or Bing etc are surface skimmers, but often they require little more than some additional search words or a Boolean to find what you want.  What is very much needed is an image matcher that is as good as the word searchers.  TinEye is nothing like as good at it as Google is at word matching, and Google image only searches for the titles of images.
Sorry - thread diversion!

John

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 22/4/2012 4:16 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 3031
First: 27/3/2012
Last: 11/5/2013
Wikipedia cannot be used to treat patients!

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 23/4/2012 4:09 AM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 19
First: 15/2/2012
Last: 11/7/2012
most time i dont use this website to treat my patients,it is good to learn some information about treatment or diagnose ,but the treatment will combine the patient' situation to cure them .

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 24/4/2012 12:06 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 76
First: 16/12/2008
Last: 28/5/2012
Bit wary of wikipedia but often end up there. I google everything now but try to only look at sites I know and trust. Easy to get distracted though! Looking at the screen rather than patient is a constant tussle-whichever site I'm on.  Was caught glancing at Tesco homepage the other day by a beady eyed patient. Not good. While on holiday recently-far removed frompatients or screens, I gave myself a talking to about the need for more eye contact with human beings. But it didn't last. Does anyone have any good tips to resist the alllure of the screen and enage with the person in front of us..

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 25/4/2012 12:24 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 17
First: 9/3/2012
Last: 27/4/2012
i think it'a not wise to search a treatment or algorithm from a wikipedia only because i think it's not a reliable source. it's much better if we treat based on textbook or journal that has been published

Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?

posted at 25/4/2012 12:30 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 17
First: 9/3/2012
Last: 27/4/2012
In Response to Re: Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?:
Wikipedia cannot be used to treat patients!
Posted by Dr. K. Ashutosh

yes I totally agree with Dr. Ashutosh. As we all know that everyone can be the author in wikipedia. But we must analyze what are the sources or references that were used.
As a doctor we treat the patient using the same standard medical practice
 First << 1 2 3 >> Last

Forums » Open clinical » General clinical » Would you use Wikipedia to treat patients?