Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
False
General clinical
Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
Discuss any specialty in this open forum for all healthcare professionals
A pilot scheme has found that one in four deaths are not recorded accurately, when compared to a patients' medical notes and case histories. The pilot is designed to prevent a repeat of Harold Shipman
0
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:GeneralClinical
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:GeneralClinicalDiscussion:73e8c0fc-2b01-4b3e-9bb4-224b9f77c981
Forums » Open clinical » General clinical » Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
|
Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 13/8/2012 9:43 AM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
*Moderator*
Posts: 1447
First: 7/4/2011 Last: 22/5/2013 |
A pilot scheme has found that one in four deaths are not recorded accurately, when compared to a patients' medical notes and case histories. The pilot is designed to prevent a repeat of Harold Shipman who falsified the cause of death. Dr Alan Fletcher, a consultant at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, was appointed Britain’s first ' 'Medical Examiner' "said it was unlikely that doctors were deliberately falsifying information but warned that a lack of precision meant that death records might be hiding the true scale of some deadly diseases. It also means that families are often told the wrong cause of a loved-one’s death." It was found that doctors often noted the immediate reason for a patient's death, rather than the cause. For example, as patient who had terminal cancer but who contracted pneumonia was listed as having died from pneumonia. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9467128/One-in-four-deaths-not-properly-recorded.html Is it something which is being taught in medical education? Why aren't the patients' medical notes or case histories being referred to in these cases? |
|
Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 13/8/2012 10:42 AM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 14/8/2012 11:09 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
Posts: 5
First: 13/3/2012 Last: 14/8/2012 |
In Response to Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?: The simple answer to you question is because we do not do enough post-mortem examinations. In my view every case where the cause of death is not blindingly obvious should have a post-mortem. It's not good enough to say that it was probably an MI or a stroke or pneumonia based on little more than a hunch yet that's what the current system allows and tolerates. Posted by skyesteve Fully agree with this. There is very little teaching on this at undergraduate level and virtually none after starting house jobs! There has a been a gradual loss of pathologists and a culture towards avoiding post-mortems permeates the system. Even Coroner's officers put pressure on juniors to write factitious certificates.... Only in the old fashioned Teaching Hospitals did students and juniors actually attend post-mortems and get a grilling from the grizzly professor. This useful process of education died out years ago.... The death certification form itself is rather archaic and encourages woolly thinking. Until the form is re-designed we will continue to have poor documentation of death.
|
|
Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 14/8/2012 11:44 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 15/8/2012 5:53 AM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Why are 25% of deaths not being properly recorded?
posted at 15/8/2012 10:09 AM BST
on bmj.com
|






