What do you think?

Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?
False
Diabetes
Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?
Discuss any aspect of type I or type II diabetes mellitus here
The National Diabetes Audit has found that only 54% of diabetes patients are receiving all nine checks recommended by NICE, which include: blood glucose concentrations blood pressure, cholestrol conc
0
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:209c1fee-a6e1-4cf9-9bd5-7d4dd5443e39
Cat:OpenClinicalForum:209c1fee-a6e1-4cf9-9bd5-7d4dd5443e39Discussion:9b68383a-89d6-4db8-94c5-85a8541695b6

Forums » Open clinical » Diabetes » Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register
 
Forums  »  Open clinical  »  Diabetes  »  Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

posted at 14/6/2012 11:40 AM BST on bmj.com
*Moderator*
Posts: 1452
First: 7/4/2011
Last: 25/5/2013
The National Diabetes Audit has found that only 54% of diabetes patients are receiving all nine checks recommended by NICE, which include: blood glucose concentrations blood pressure, cholestrol concentrations, kidney function (blood and urine tests), retinal screening, foot and leg checks and assessment of weight and smoking status. The audit also found that those under 55 were less likely to get all their checks than older patients.

BMJ News reports that "36 primary care trust areas in England (out of 151) recorded fewer than half of their patients as having had all their annual GP checks. In one trust—Mid Essex Primary Care Trust—only
16% of patients received all nine checks. By comparison 71% of patients in Darlington Primary Care Trust received all the checks in 2010-11."

http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e4142

What are the reasons behind diabetes patients not receiving the checks as recommended by NICE? Is diabetes being treated seriously enough? Are these too many tests to carry out? What are the risks of not carrying them out?


Re: Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

posted at 16/6/2012 2:13 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 312
First: 2/6/2012
Last: 10/5/2013
in developing country ,most diabetic patient do not know the diabetic severity and complication along with they have financial weaknes to take all cheakup of diabetes.

Re: Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

posted at 16/6/2012 3:07 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 3045
First: 27/3/2012
Last: 20/5/2013
It is of crucial importance to check for complications in all the diabetes patients to be able to have the necessary steps as early as possible.
But it is a fact that not all the diabetics are being checked properly according to the NICE guidelines, & this should be considered as 'negligent' attitude.
The recommended routine checkups are not time consuming & mostly are clinical procedures.
There seem no reasons for not carrying out the important checkups.

Re: Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?

posted at 16/6/2012 8:26 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 453
First: 29/4/2011
Last: 14/5/2013
it's not a diabetes problem. it is a system probelm. below,  for example, is the latest CDC report from the US:

CDC Highlights Underuse of Clinical Preventive Services in U.S.

Just half of U.S. adults received clinical preventive services, such as screenings and prescriptions, from 2007 to 2010, according to a CDC study. Published as a supplement to MMWR, the report is intended to provide baseline data on the preventive services available before the Affordable Care Act was passed.

Among the notable findings:

  • Less than half of people with ischemic cardiovascular disease were prescribed aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs.
  • Less than half of those with hypertension had it under control.
  • In the preceding 5 years, only 68% had their cholesterol assessed.
  • Over a third of outpatient visits had no record of the patient's tobacco use. Of the patients who screened positive for tobacco use, only 21% received counseling and 8% received prescriptions for cessation medications.
  • People without insurance were 10% to 30% less likely to use such preventive services, compared with population averages. The CDC suggests that improving insurance coverage could increase use of these services.

MMWR Supplement (Free)

COMMENT: Drs. are tought to treat symptoms and focus their limited time on whatever the patient is complaing about.  It is to be expected that screening and preventative services will fall out of such a model.  The only way we are going to fix this is by the application of the principles of the chronic disease model http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=the_chronic_care_model&s=2  An isolated physician in a clinic cannot do this.  51 % of American physicians are in solo practice.  Combine that with the financial incentives of the fee for service model and you get little preventative care.  What is interesting is that other financial models do not seem to be much better, i. e. the British system.  i wonder if the per cent of solo practitioners versus the larger group practices in the various BHS administrative units correlates with the performance of prevenative services.  It should if the larger practives use team care.  Any data on this?

Forums » Open clinical » Diabetes » Why don't diabetes patients receive all the checks they need, as recommended by NICE?