What do you think?

How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?
False
News & media
How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?
Debate current medical affairs
With over whelming evidence in the last decade that pharmaceutical idustry in collaboration with leading healthcare physicians has been ghostwiriting article, infleuncing opinions and willfully withho
0
Cat:OffDutyForum:NewsMedia
Cat:OffDutyForum:NewsMediaDiscussion:5356b8d7-bf50-4201-b8cb-e8150712250c

Forums » Off duty » News & media » How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register
 
Forums  »  Off duty  »  News & media  »  How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

posted at 4/6/2012 4:39 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 311
First: 7/5/2009
Last: 2/4/2013
With over whelming evidence in the last decade that pharmaceutical idustry in collaboration with leading healthcare physicians has been ghostwiriting article, infleuncing opinions and willfully withholding negative effects of their trials, this news is a postive step in the right direction

Read the details here


Other MPIP sponsors -- Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Merck -- as well as Novartis and Pfizer have endorsed the 10 recommendations.

The complete list, published in the May issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings by Maja Zecevic, PhD, MD, of The Lancet, and colleagues, is as follows:

  1. Ensure clinical studies and publications address clinically important questions.
  2. Make public all results, including negative or unfavorable ones, in a timely fashion, while avoiding redundancy.
  3. Improve understanding and disclosure of authors' potential conflicts of interest.
  4. Educate authors on how to develop quality manuscripts and meet journal expectations.
  5. Improve disclosure of authorship contributions and writing assistance, and continue education on best publication practices to end ghostwriting and guest authorship.
  6. Report adverse event data more transparently and in a more clinically meaningful manner.
  7. Provide access to more complete protocol information.
  8. Transparently report statistical methods used in analysis.
  9. Ensure authors can access complete study data, know how to do so, and can attest to this.
  10. Support the sharing of prior reviews from other journals.

Re: How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

posted at 4/6/2012 5:58 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 3045
First: 27/3/2012
Last: 20/5/2013
Surely drrathore, it has been perfectly pointed out by you that pharmaceutical idustries in collaboration with leading healthcare physicians have been ghostwiriting articles, infleuncing opinions and willfully withholding negative effects of their trials! This is why I always try to avoid the outcomes of most of the clinical trials or studies done almost every day, nowadays. We should be very careful to accept & apply the results of newer studies, especially if these have been sponsored by the pharmaceutical industries.

Re: How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

posted at 4/6/2012 6:25 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 311
First: 7/5/2009
Last: 2/4/2013
Thanks   Dr. K. Ashutosh

Here is an excellent essay on this topic. A bit old but with thought provoking ideas and facts

Re: How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?

posted at 4/6/2012 10:37 PM BST on bmj.com
Posts: 3045
First: 27/3/2012
Last: 20/5/2013
Many thanks drrathore! I have gone through the essay by carl elliott, & found it to be very realistic. He has critically said 'We have known for many years that pharma funding influences behavior. Individually, the influence may be slight or even nonexistent; statistically, the result is a clinical and research agenda overwhelmingly shaped by pharma money. Still, we cling to the vast collective delusion that because we cannot see a provable causal link between funding and our own individual behavior, no real influence has been exerted.'

Forums » Off duty » News & media » How are the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Medical Journals tacking the credibility issue?