Wikipedia vs Drug Rep: Who do you trust?
False
General
Wikipedia vs Drug Rep: Who do you trust?
Discuss non-medical topics
I once heard a doctor say he can learn far more on Wikipedia about a drug than a pharma rep is even allowed to tell him, so why would he want to see the drug rep? What's your view? If you had to choos
0
Cat:OffDutyForum:General
Cat:OffDutyForum:GeneralDiscussion:493ef3a2-8198-4535-a7c3-4c211cefc3ba
|
Wikipedia vs Drug Rep: Who do you trust?
posted at 13/7/2012 12:37 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Wikipedia vs Drug Rep: Who do you trust?
posted at 17/7/2012 4:47 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
Posts: 51
First: 26/9/2009 Last: 22/7/2012 |
I am in industry and the wikipedia page on our device http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LLLT frequently swings from corporate vested interests in favour of LLLT (probably laser companies) to corporate vested interests against LLLT (I'm guessing pharma companies), and occasionally there is a sober academic tone (which is where the page seems to be at the time of writing) though it is inadequate on mechanisum of action and dose.
I would not expect doctors to get adequate insight on prescribing treatment from what is there today, they might just be able to grasp the vague idea that laser beams can regenerate tissue, have an anti-inflammatory effect and induce analgesia in musculoskeletal / neuuropathic pain pathologies. Yes I know, it sounds very Star Trek. |
|
Re: Wikipedia vs Drug Rep: Who do you trust?
posted at 17/7/2012 5:56 PM BST
on bmj.com
|






