Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
False
General
Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
Discuss non-medical topics
Should consenting adults be allowed to do what they wish with their bodies? So, if they wish to donate a kidney for money should we allow it? And if not, why not? Afterall we wouldn't dream of condem
0
Cat:OffDutyForum:General
Cat:OffDutyForum:GeneralDiscussion:32fa1565-9639-477a-9e1d-7a68375838ca
|
Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 29/6/2012 4:44 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 29/6/2012 5:38 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 29/6/2012 9:19 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 29/6/2012 10:11 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 2/7/2012 8:44 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 6/7/2012 12:09 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 6/7/2012 1:14 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 7/7/2012 7:33 AM BST
on bmj.com
|
Posts: 2947
First: 10/3/2009 Last: 29/4/2013 |
In Response to Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?: Being an Australian Baby Boomer brought nurtured on traditional Christian values, our generation was taught that is is not only proper, but one's social obligation to give arms. Posted by Odysseus I have just found out that our government prohibits arms giving but lawyers advise me that it is still legal to lend a hand.
|
|
Re: Should consenting adults be allowed to sell their own body parts?
posted at 7/7/2012 1:47 PM BST
on bmj.com
|
Posts: 43
First: 10/2/2010 Last: 5/11/2012 |
Incentivising the sale of body parts, particularly kidneys, is an interesting question. - There is a clear shortage of kidneys; for instance, in the UK there are currently 6,283 people in the queue for a transplant (http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/ukt/statistics/downloads/weekly_stats.pdf). Maintaining dialysis treatment for these people is a burden both on them and their lives and on the financial resources of the NHS. - Giving a kidney is really very safe (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22287701). So we wouldn't actually be paying people to do something especially dangerous, unlike, say, when we pay a soldier to go to war. - Worldwide, there would seem to be two models for financial remuneration of donors. On the one hand, you have the black market in organs internationally, where people give kidneys in unsafe circumstances for whatever is being offered. On the other... you have the Iranian model, in which living donors are remunerated to a set extent by the government, and then may subsequently receive a gift from the donors (while maintaining due separation to avoid any negotiation of the size of said gift), and which claims to have eliminated the queue for kidneys in Iran. - Other options to improve donor uptake would include better systematic recruitment of cadaveric donors, including but not limited to opt-out (the Spanish model), or incentivisation by giving registered donors preference to receive donated organs over other people who are other equally matched in terms of their need of the same organs and their fitness to receive them (the Israeli model). - In an ideal world, of course, we might also be able to reduce demand through persuading more people to adopt good health-seeking behaviour in terms of diet and exercise and thus have less people joining the kidney queue in the first place. However, not all of said queue is in it for lifestyle-related reasons. Personally, and looking particularly at the UK, I'd favour starting with better donor recruitment, a la Spain. And if that, plus maybe the Israeli idea, isn't enough, we might then want to do something like the system in Iran... although I'd favour having the "gift" part of the transaction going to a charity of the donor's choice, rather than being given to the donor themselves. Does that sound like a workable plan? |









