GMC Revalidation - Are the criteria subjective?
False
Careers
GMC Revalidation - Are the criteria subjective?
Discuss training, careers, and education
Revalidation commences this month The criteria are: 1) Continuing professional development 2) Quality Improvement Activity 3) Significant events 4) Feedback from colleagues 5) Feedback from patients
0
Cat:BMJForum:Careers
Cat:BMJForum:CareersDiscussion:83a7c439-e56f-4ec5-b6fa-6d378e81e809
|
GMC Revalidation - Are the criteria subjective?
posted at 1/12/2012 9:10 AM GMT
on bmj.com
|
Posts: 145
First: 14/5/2012 Last: 22/5/2013 |
Revalidation commences this month The criteria are: 1) Continuing professional development 2) Quality Improvement Activity 3) Significant events 4) Feedback from colleagues 5) Feedback from patients 6) Review of complaints and compliments It seems that many of these are very subjective. Should the criteria become objective? In my recent blog I argue that the criteria should become objective as soon as possible: http://successinhealthcare.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/revalidation.html |
|
|
Re: GMC Revalidation - Are the criteria subjective?
posted at 1/12/2012 5:02 PM GMT
on bmj.com
|
|
Posts: 1
First: 1/12/2012 Last: 1/12/2012 |
I agree that many of the areas are subjective. But issues such as feedback will always be subjective but none the less very useful. What we do is not just a science but involves aspects of art http://www.gplogbook.com |
|
|
Re: GMC Revalidation - Are the criteria subjective?
posted at 1/12/2012 7:08 PM GMT
on bmj.com
|
|
Posts: 145
First: 14/5/2012 Last: 22/5/2013 |
Zook, I agree subjective is very useful. But whether it should dominate the criteria which has the potential of changing the course of a doctor's career is a crucial question. |
