It's a tough decision. On the one hand, I think it's always best to air as many opinions as possible, regardless of how you might personally feel about them, if for no other reason than to show the weaknesses in their arguments. However, in some cases, when the basis for so much of what is being said is so clearly based in ignorance and racism, should those views be given the implied respect that publication would give them?

I don't think the BNP has any grasp of the strengths and weaknesses of our health system and what they say on the subject is utter rubbish. But maybe exposing their views would be beneficial in that genuine concerns that are held by the public can be looked into without being exploited by such a vile political party.

Let's consider two simple, clear, significant  FACTS: A) it's generally admitted that Diabetes is a today's growing epidemics; B) the identical statement is valid for cancer, in spite of expensive campaigns of war angainst these disorders! All advised measures aiming to ameliorate NHS policy - I think so - will be a further FLOP, costing a lot of money. My 55 year-long clinical experience allows me to state that the efficacious Primary Prevention could be realized at the condition that ALL constitutions are bedside recognized since birth of people, so that are enrolled in such as prevention exclusively individuals at INHERITED Real Risk for diabetes, hypertension, CAD, cancer and so on, who must undergo therapeutic no expensive monitoring.