What do you think?

Most popular blogs

Latest blog posts

Blog Image
Thoughts and opinion from the wards
Which is better: a single payer health care system or a multiple payer health care system?

Agree with me or not, but comparing single payer health care system to the multiple payer one restages the eternal confrontation between socialism and capitalism. Each has its’ pros and cons for sure, and in the next few lines I will try to explain the differences between them.

Single payer health care system is publicly funded, mostly free for the beneficiaries at the point of use. It is financed more progressively, and relies mainly on the existing taxation system that allows the government to collect and pool tax revenues and purchase health services for the entire population; effectively distributes the risks throughout one large risk pool; is carried out on a non-profit basis; and offers the government a high degree of control over the total expenditure on health. It is a single health care plan in which all the essential “medically necessary” health care services are covered while alternative medicine health care services, dental services, and optometry services are mostly not covered. Some of the advantages of this system include:

  • No financial barriers to the single health care plan of the single payer health care system.
  • Health coverage is not affected by loss or change of jobs.
  • No lifetime limits or exclusions for preexisting health conditions of the beneficiaries.
  • Prices of the medications are negotiated with suppliers to control their costs.
  • Can’t buy priority.
  • Preventive care and early detection programs are fundamental in the single health care plan of the single payer health care system.

While disadvantages of this system are:

  • Gaps with the medications, dental services, ambulance services, and long-term care services.
  • A very traditional, medical model of health care practice in which the beneficiaries will avoid alternative medicine health care professionals as their services are not covered by the single health care plan of the single payer health care system.
  • Bureaucratic procedures and budget issues rationalize which health care services are deemed “medically necessary” and therefore covered and which are not.
  • Time lags and cost constraints with new ‘cutting-edge’ technologies.
  • Long wait time for non-emergency medically necessary health care services.
  • Weakness on cost control and cost minimization.

Multiple payer health care system is a market oriented system that is mainly funded by private health care insurance companies. It is financed more regressively, and relies mainly on the financial capability of the beneficiary that allows the beneficiary to purchase the desired health care services via the private health insurance companies; distributes the risks at different levels of the risk pool; is carried out on a profit for service basis; and sacrifices the control of the government for a greater ability to meet the diverse preferences of beneficiaries. There are different health care plans in which all health care services are covered including alternative medicine health care services, dental services, and optometry services but the choice of the plan depends on the preference and the financial capability of the beneficiary. Advantages of this system are:

  • No time lags and no cost constraints with new ‘cutting-edge’ technologies.
  • Short wait time for non-emergency medically necessary health care services.
  • No gaps with the medications, dental services, ambulance services, and long-term care services.
  • All health care services are covered. There are no exemptions but there are different plans that meet the different needs of the beneficiaries.

While some of the disadvantages of this system include:

  • Only specific segments of the population are covered by the different health care plans of the multiple payer health care system, while other segments of the population are disqualified and excluded from these plans.
  • Health coverage is affected by loss or change of jobs.
  • There are financial barriers to the different health care plans of the multiple payer health care system.
  • Can buy priority

I am biased towards the single payer health care system for what it offers towards solidarity and distributive justice. All for one and one for all – Humanity is one and health care is a basic need of life, so why for Heaven’s sake do we deprive a group of people from their right in accessing essential health care if they can’t afford it. Which health care system are you in favour of?

Tags:
Email this post
User Image
DrTS wrote:
Single payer is best based on what I know. The system in the US has excluded millions of people from health care. The NHS though flawed is not set up with this inherent flaw. Mixed models where everyone must have insurance subsidised by the state may be better. I have no problem with single payers rationning and not allowing access to alternative theralies that have no evidence base.
23/10/2011 11:17 PM BST on bmj.com
User Image
JFreeman wrote:
I am a physician in the US, and a strong advocate for a single-payer system. This would not have to be an employed-physician system as in the UK, but more like Canadian Medicare. All of the advantages that you point out for single-payer are true, but the "advantages" of a private insurance system are only advantages for some, the higher income and more privileged. It enhances class division, and excludes people. Thus it limits quality (Schiff et al, "Lack of access is the greatest quality deficit"). It increases cost (vide: the US health care system) and does not increase health outcomes (the US lags most OECD countries). One important distinction is how health care is paid for and how much is paid, overall. Thus, the "disadvantages" of the single-payer systems (eg., wait times) would disappear if they spent as much money per capita as the US does (or a lot less); it would be going to actually provide care, rather than profit for insurance companies, large providers, and drug companies. And, of course, as DrTS suggests, much of that care that US insured folks have access to is inappropriate and causes more harm than good (to the patient), although it usually is "good" (financially) for the doctor, hospital, device maker, etc.
23/10/2011 11:46 PM BST on bmj.com
User Image
drdwright wrote:
single payer is a better system - healthcare in the usa is a nightmare. jfreeman speaks tthe truth when he says it creates deeper economic divides and this is likely to only create more health problems for a nation.
24/10/2011 4:35 PM BST on bmj.com
User Image
btoema wrote:
Dear DrTs, thanks for your comment. I have created a poll on this debate. Please share and vote. The link is http://doc2doc.bmj.com/forums/off-duty_news-media_better-single-payer-health-care-system-multiple-payer-health-care-system Thanks; Bassem
24/10/2011 5:22 PM BST on bmj.com
User Image
btoema wrote:
Dear JFreeman, thanks for your comment. I have created a poll on this debate. Please share and vote. The link is http://doc2doc.bmj.com/forums/off-duty_news-media_better-single-payer-health-care-system-multiple-payer-health-care-system Thanks; Bassem
24/10/2011 5:24 PM BST on bmj.com
User Image
btoema wrote:
Dear drdwright, thanks for your comment. I have created a poll on this debate. Please share and vote. The link is http://doc2doc.bmj.com/forums/off-duty_news-media_better-single-payer-health-care-system-multiple-payer-health-care-system Thanks; Bassem
24/10/2011 5:30 PM BST on bmj.com