|
Does being a parent make you a better paediatrician?
I was in my office, on the routine parental counselling chat known as the prenatal visit. I was talking to two young future parents. Recently graduated from my paediatric residency training I was eager to see difficult cases on wards and manage complex situations in the emergency department. Suddenly I realised that all the questions coming from the young couple had nothing to do with complex cardiac arrhythmias, adenosine doses, chest tubes or acid-base disorders. “I am planning to breastfeed” –She said- “but I would like to work soon, so I am planning to collect breast milk and freeze it … for how long can I keep the milk in the freezer?” “Also I am planning to use bottles. Should I use a steriliser? And for how long should I use it? Two, three months?” Difficult times indeed, but I was happy because soon I learnt the basics of the evidence-based medicine process. I tried to search for the best research on those topics. For my surprise it was not a widely researched area. Many holes and grey areas, and most of the recommendations were only that: recommendations, no evidence whatsoever! My residency training did not prepare me to face those questions. Years ago I was at one party when one of the guesses (and a mother too) heard I was a paediatrician; she approached to me and asked me if I was a parent. I was surprised by her question and I said “no”; then she alleged she would not go to a paediatrician who was not a parent, as he or she would not understand the pain and stress from a parent, and most certainly could not answer all those questions like those above described, without experience. "Well" -I said- "then, men are worse gynaecologists than women because we don t have a uterus?" I was angry and preoccupied. The next day I went to the supermarket and tried to learn the prices of the pacifiers, I tried to memorise the brand names for strollers and car seats; even at the restaurants I sat next to the group of mothers talking about their issues and common concerns about their babies, taking notes and trying to answer those questions by using my evidence-based knowledge. I remember doing shifts with one of my fellow paediatricians who was a proud mother of two. It was a common occurrence that during the shift, mothers bringing their children to the emergency room asked one or two questions regarding the “puericulture process” of being a parent, i.e., knowing all that stuff that she knew, but I didn't because I was not an experienced father. She usually had the answers, maybe not evidence-based, but mother-based. And it worked; mothers or fathers of patients usually asked for her to see their kids, specially when questions of puericulture emerged. But my question during that period was if being a parent made any of my peers a better physician? Did they have more knowledge than I had? Or were they taking decisions based on their translated feelings from their own children towards the children in front of them? One night I thought: “What parents liked is the rapport, the art of medicine”. One common question parents ask us when we as doctors share a decision with them is “what would you do if this were your son?” “I would not see my own son as a physician” –I reply- “I would lose objectivity and I would not be taking the right decision” Many of my peers think alike; they had confessed that sometimes they could not avoid thinking about their own children when facing a difficult decision. I am now soon becoming a parent for the first time. My wife and I are doing all the shopping and questions that my patients usually had. I have to be honest; being a paediatrician surely has made the shopping and the questions a lot easier; and being a parent has made the handling of “puericulture” questions a lot easier too. I may be biased, but I think being a parent has made me more human and I think my patients like it. But this can happen without me having kids. At least I tried during my residency years and afterwards. What do parents prefer? Is this the art vs science dilemma that we usually talk about in medicine? As a father, personally I do not mind whether my physician is or not a father/mother, as long as he/she is a professional. Could this be one of the reasons why people would not embrace evidence-based medicine? More care means better medicine? Patients think that IS TRUE (as noted on this study from Health Affairs). … food for thought...
Tags:
|
Recent Entries
Archives
Most Recent Tags
|



I began to reply here; it got too long so I put it here instead:
http://post.ly/iryu
Yours,
Ian Wacogne @ian_wac
It also begs a second question - are you an even better paediatrician if your child has had a serious illness versus being "simply" the parent of a healthy child? The answer (and I speak from experience, my toddler having had 3 admissions to PICU and a partial colectomy) is patently no, but only that your experiences shape you as a human being, and therefore as a doctor. It doesn't make you better, it just makes empathy much easier.
An update. My baby girl was born yesterday (a systematic review for her can be seen here: http://imgur.com/a79pT ); and one of my peers (younger than me three years) actually was her attending paediatrician, and he has no kids. What I would look for in a doctor for my daughter has to do with professionalism and humanism. I guess the old discussion about those two necessities that make a doctor a good one, I think; or as published in this article http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/19/1988
the practice of etiquette based medicine in every area or specialty in the health care profession.
Best wishes
And congratulations for your baby girl!
Thanks for the article link. I agree with the point of professionalism and humanism. Also, at the end of the day, it's the perceived quality of the doctor that matters for the patient. And this criteria of perceived quality may differ between one patient and another. Although we as physicians may have a similar voice of what is best to look for in a doctor, as patients we may opt for slightly different things.
However in todays society the problem seems to be that many children are becoming parents and when they turn to a parent for advice they find that their own parents are still children...
(case of teenage pregnancies and the 35year old grandmother who really lacks the pearls of wisdom that older wiser parents had in times gone by!)
societies changing and a paediatrician ... or any doctor who is a parent stands to be of some use to lost teen parents!
Is it really bad medicine to look at a patient as one would look at one's own child? I find that doing so does have its benefits:
I think about all the symptoms carefully
I examine thoroughly
I consider the differential diagnoses logically
I explain to the parents like I would like my doctor to explain things to me
I investigate only if there is a definite indication of benefit
I am not tempted to try borderline treatments
I readily ask for a second opinion.
Of course, all patients should be treated this way. But in the hustle and bustle of modern hi-tech medicine this does not always happen and perhaps a little "personalization" is probably not a bad thing.